|
Back to Myopia Index
Previous Page Next Page
3.1 Distribution of Myopia by Region, Age, Gender and Ethnicity
We can draw conclusions about the impact of different lifestyles, different environment, different
nutrition, and different genetic heredity by comparing the variation in rates of myopia according
to age in different regions. Some results are:
An evaluation of statistical data for reported blindness due to malignant myopia in different
states of the USA was done by compiling a chart with the rate of myopia per state, and
distance to seacoast, annual hours of sunshine and the nutritional concentration of calcium,
fluoride and selenium in each state. The following factors resulted in a higher probability of malignant myopia:71
- less sunshine,
- less calcium,
- less fluoride,
- less selenium and
- closer to a seacoast
Myopia rates are higher in urban than in rural areas.90, 91, 92.
Note:
Of course, farmers don't have much time to read.
The frequency of myopia at children in various countries is93:
- Germany - 10%,
- Taiwan, South Korea - 70%,
- Japan - 95%,
- Singapore - 74%94
- Mexico - 44%95
Myopia recently worsened as a problem, as stated by Lin et al.96: "In Taiwan, myopia was
not a problem some 50 years ago"; today about 15% of the population have over - 7.0 D.
50 to 60 % of the Japanese are said to be myopic, but only 2 % of the people in South
America are myopic97. The author of this publication hints at a substantial difference with
respect to spontaneity between these two populations.
The incidence of myopia in Japan was increasing from 15% in 1920 to 36% in 1940 to between
50 and 60% in 198597.
Sherpa and Tibetan children in Nepal have the same ancestry and genetic history, but the
prevalence of myopia is 2.7% for Sherpa children and 21.7% for Tibetan children98. This
difference was attributed to more rigorous schooling and higher advanced technology in
Tibet.
Note:
Generally more rigorous schooling and higher advanced technology are going hand in hand
with a change in nutrition and increased mental stress. For the impact of nutrition on myopia
see section 3.16, for the impact of stress see section 3.13.1.
Results of a study on Eskimos99 are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Percentage of myopes among Eskimos
Data about the degree of myopia in various populations100 are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Percentage of myopes among various populations
A study from 2001103, giving the percentage of myopic males (at least -0.5 D) between age
16 and 25 in Singapore:
Another statistic from USA (children, age 5-17 years)104 is shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Percentage of myopes among various populations in the USA
Typical childhood progression rates were found to be between 0.2 D and 0.6 D in
Europe and USA, and between 0.5 D and 0.8 D in Japan105.
In spite of similar myopia rates of Malays and Chinese, the age dependent progression
profile appears to be rather different106.
Results from Singapore and Hong Kong show that myopia is 1.5 to 2.5 times more prevalent
among adult Chinese than in corresponding European-derived populations, and that
women have significantly higher myopia rates than men107, 108.
Moreover, as stated by Choo109, "...severity of myopia rises by about 1.5 D per year in Singapore
children, compared with 0.5 D per year in US children."
The higher rate of female myopes is confirmed by results about Greek students: 46% female
students, and 29.7% male students are myopic110.
Dayan found111: "During the 13 years from 1990 to 2002, the prevalence of myopia significantly
increased among the Israeli population. Although there was an association with the
level of education, gender, ethnicity, and origin, the prevalence of myopia increased on an
annual basis, independent of these factors."
|